Nicholaus Albrecht |
Abstract: …the subjunctive made manifest
Methodology: …the muscle memory of foreign grammars
that which flexor digitorum touches, contraction of all profundus possesses.
distal articles, both definite and indefinite, become proximal.
the phonetics and morphology of two subjects modify,
thenar eminence to thenar eminence, opposable locks consummate.
elevation of pitch, elevation of scapulae obfuscates suggestion,
nucleic buzzing of electrons, syntactically powered
left hemisphere/ posterior-superior temporal
synaptic shrugs of shoulders and semantics
external rotation of inflection, of implication, of scapula
flexion of lateral appendage-phrase, sudden extension
contacts of proton verbal bodies and neutron corporeal morphemes
digital tension, opposable locks remain open, thus closed
monitored by the proximal, administered by the distal
double blinded in the singular and in plurality
Results: …the predication of the flesh
digital flexions in earnest – in brevity connects, with brevis
abductor flexor opponens to lock pollicis – in apposition
joints and chords articulate, atoms form from atoms,
nuclear orbits of thought and form coalesce –separate – transcend,
extend to collide with nitrogen, oxygens of another
friction, to caress the hydrogens and carbons of a soul.
Discussion: …the conjunction of ambivalence
Ubi sumus? Quis hic locus? Quae regio? Quae mundi plaga? Ubi sum?
(Where are we? What place is this? What kingdom? What strike/wound/region/shore/snare of [what] world? Where am I?)
What brevity of connection cannot be overcome with opposition?
What brevity of opposition cannot be overcome with connection?
What word is chosen between distal apertures of the human condition?
Conclusion: …the true language of the vulgate
- verbal and corporeal energy is neither created nor destroyed,
- but is harnessed, but is released, but is directed.
- like attracts like opposites attract, language is automatic.
- in absence, in isolation, nothing remains in complete certainty.
- touch is the most powerful form of communication, hard to misinterpret or mistranslate.
vibrations of physical words and epistemological limbs are received uniquely to the subjects, interpreted through imperfection. much is lost in translation. objectively subjective experience observed. reality is defined in the moment, refined in hindsight. the future tense remains uncertain.